As
I approach the age of thirty, I’ve begun the expected ruminations and analyses
of the last decade of my life. One epiphany I had recently: I’ve written almost
every week day, Monday to Friday, throughout my twenties. It sounds shocking
and yet—it’s true. This detail jumps out nicely from all the other
inconsistencies.
After
ten years, you’d think I’d have my writing process down to an exact science. In
truth, aside from choosing to write with my freshest mind—which means in my
earliest, brightest moments in the morning— little elements of my writing
routine have remained consistent. But as I look back at my writing process over
the last decade, one consistent theme is my dependence on technology.
My
writing day usually begins by browsing through digital notepads: Facebook
messages I send to myself, Twitter messages I send to myself, texts I send to
myself. They all have a list of ideas, conveniently (automatically) dated for
easy organization. Usually, I work through my ideas and inspirations for my
current project in this space (I am really a project artist: I tend to
obsessively focus on one project at a time). Though, I also record spontaneous
things: aspirations for future projects, links to essays I want might to
revisit later, etc.
Technology
makes my writing day convenient; it allows me to log my notes with relative
ease. According to Joan Didion, who wrote about the difference between the
writer and the non-writer in her book, The Year of Magical Thinking, this
is the defining quality of creative writers: the writer transcribes their ideas
physically; the non-writer merely has the idea, and lets it pass before
expressing it on the page. Technology has transformed my writing process by simplifying
the act of expression. I am rarely without my phone, and if I’m without my
phone, there’s a good chance I’m either near someone who does or I’m at my
laptop. I don’t need to keep flashcards
in the pocket of my blazer or lug around a notebook. If I need to reflect on
the project I’m working on, I only need to open a web browser, or look down at
my cell phone.
I
am also dependent on technology for inspiration. It is an inefficient way to
conduct research, but then again, it has benefits. My method for collecting
data is simple: I simply scroll and scroll, through my Twitter feed and my Facebook
feed. I browse the internet to get an idea of what and how people are thinking
and feeling, what they are talking about. This is how, or one way at least, the
internet has changed the daily lives of writers. The complicated world, all its
information and thoughts, is now within reach by our computer mouse. This
sounds like hyperbole, but I don’t think it is. Today people, both writers and
ordinary folk, have more access to information—as well as private thoughts and
sentiments of individuals—than ever before. So, the art we make should be more profound,
simply because we have more data.
My
writing day begins by waking and skimming various posts on random topics; most
of what I ingest is useless, but every now and then, I will read something
totally brilliant or totally radical, which will upend the way I think. These
moments of understanding—and deeper comprehension of the world I live in—are
vital for my process, for I need to understand the world to write about it well
(in my opinion). I also extrapolate an
embarrassing amount of information/ understanding from watching television or
documentaries. I have admittedly learned a lot about plot and world-building
from HBO series and movies.
In
general. I start writing as soon as I wake up. (It is impossible for me to
write any other time of day. I have gone through great pains to preserve this
time of the day, saying no to jobs I probably would’ve been good at. For me, it
is imperative to write while my mind is fresh, and still a little sleepy.) I
rotate between a desktop computer (which I like to imagine is a sort of
supercomputer) and my Macbook laptop, which is sadly on its last legs. In the
morning I write with coffee. I try to write like I am dreaming, try to refrain
from having too much control on the words or ideas as they flow out. It helps
me avoid tricky situations like writer’s block; I spin webs like the
subconscious mind creates in a dream: rather loosely. I don’t always understand
where I am going, but I do figure it out. I trust myself to figure it out.
These
days, I write with a kitten on my lap. He is a recent addition to my process.
Unfortunately, I don’t have a choice: he insists on sitting with me while I
write; fortunately, he has turned out to be a trusty wingman. Most of the time,
he is not a distraction.
I
have spent years telling people I am a poet. The work I produce says I am more
accurately a hybridist, an occasional poet, sometimes an experimental fiction
writer. Similarly, I have for years been telling people I am a writer…. when really
I just obsessively browse through social media, take notes on my iphone, and
watch television at night. I do string words into coherent sentences. But you
could argue my life as a writer is not so different from the life of the
nonwriter. Yet I am able to grow as an artist, all thanks to the access and
ease that technology has granted me.
Vanessa Saunders studied creative
writing at San Francisco State University and the University of East Anglia for
her undergraduate degree. She received her MFA from LSU, and now teaches writing
at Loyola University, New Orleans. Originally from the San Francisco Bay Area,
her poetry has been published or is forthcoming from PANK, Nat. Brut, Poor Claudia, Entropy, Stockholm Literary
Review, Heavy Feather Review, and
other journals. Recently her manuscript, The
Flat Woman, was longlisted for the Tarpaulin Sky Press Book Award. The Flat Woman, a cross-genre
manuscript, is a seminfinalist in another contest whose details she cannot
presently release. This winter, she is teaching an online intro to cw/ writing
hybridity class with Writing Workshops Dallas.
No comments:
Post a Comment